A SAMPLE SIZE TABLE FOR FOREST SAMPLINGSTAUFFER HB.1982; FOREST SCIENCE; ISSN 0015-749X; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 28; NO 4; PP. 777-784; BIBL. 14 REF.Article

MAXIMAL DEVIATION BETWEEN SAMPLE AND POPULATION MEANS IN FINITE POPULATIONSARNOLD BC; GROENEVELD RA.1981; J. AM. STAT. ASSOC.; ISSN 0003-1291; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 76; NO 374; PP. 443-445; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

AN EXAMPLE OF SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION FOR FAMILY STUDIESPICKLE LW; MULVIHILL JJ.1981; AM. J. EPIDEMIOL.; ISSN 0002-9262; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 114; NO 3; PP. 299-303; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

BORNES INFERIEURES POUR LE VOLUME SUFFISANT D'UN ECHANTILLON DANS LES PROCEDURES D'ESTIMATION EQUIVARIANTE GARANTIEVOLODIN IN.1982; IZV. VYSS. UCEBN. ZAVED., MAT.; ISSN 0021-3446; SUN; DA. 1982; NO 3; PP. 14-17; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ESTIMATING THE SIZE OF A TRUNCATED SAMPLEWATSON DA; BLUMENTHAL S.1980; COMMUN. STAT., THEORY METHODS; ISSN 0361-0926; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 9; NO 15; PP. 1535-1550; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

SHIFTING RESPONDENT BURDEN THROUGH UNEQUAL PROBABILITY SAMPLINGTORTRA RD; CRANK KN.1980; ESTADISTICA; ISSN 0014-1135; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 34; NO 122; PP. 71-90; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

BORNES INFERIEURES DE LA TAILLE MOYENNE D'UN ECHANTILLON DANS LES TESTS D'INVARIANCEVOLODIN IN.1980; TEOR. VEROJAT. PRIMEN.; SUN; DA. 1980; VOL. 25; NO 2; PP. 359-364; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

IMPROVED GRAPHS FOR CALCULATING SAMPLE SIZES WHEN COMPARING TWO INDEPENDENT BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTIONSALEONG J; BARTLETT DE.1979; BIOMETRICS; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 35; NO 4; PP. 875-881; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

TAILLE CRITIQUE D'UN FRAGMENT DE STRUCTURE DE REFRACTAIRES THERMORESISTANTSSTRELOV KK; PRANTSKYAVICHYUS GA.1982; PROBLEMY PROCNOSTI (KIEV); ISSN 0556-171X; UKR; DA. 1982; NO 9; PP. 57-59; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

ASYMPTOTIC SAMPLE SIZE FOR GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL LENGTHGREEN J.1982; APPLIED STATISTICS; ISSN 0035-9254; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 3; PP. 298-300; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

The prevalence of underpowered randomized clinical trials in rheumatologyKEEN, Helen I; PILE, Kevin; HILL, Catherine L et al.Journal of rheumatology. 2005, Vol 32, Num 11, pp 2083-2088, issn 0315-162X, 6 p.Article

ESTIMATING THE PROPORTION OF MUTAGENIC COMPOUNDS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLESRAO BR; JANARDAN KG; SCHAEFFER DJ et al.1982; J. TOXICOL. ENVIRON. HEALTH; ISSN 0098-4108; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 9; NO 3; PP. 499-508; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

OPTIMUM INJECTION VOLUME IN GEL FILTRATION OF PROTEINS ON TSK-GEL G3000 SWKATO Y; HASHIMOTO T.1982; HRC & CC, HIGH RESOLUT. CHROMATOGR. CHROMATOGR. COMMUN.; ISSN 0344-7138; DEU; DA. 1982; VOL. 5; NO 10; PP. 577; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

SAMPLE SIZE AND TOLERANCE LIMITSJILEK M.1982; TRABAJOS DE ESTADISTICA Y DE INVESTIGACION OPERATIVA; ISSN 0041-0241; ESP; DA. 1982; VOL. 33; NO 2; PP. 64-78; ABS. SPA; BIBL. 2 P.Article

SUR L'ESTIMATION DE LA TAILLE D'UNE POPULATION FINIEIVCHENKO GI; TIMONINA EE.1982; TEOR. VEROJATN. EE PRIMEN.; ISSN 0040-361X; SUN; DA. 1982; VOL. 27; NO 2; PP. 380-384; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

A SIMPLE PROOF OF THE NONAPPLICABILITY OF THE CENTRAL LIMIT THEOREM TO FINITE POPULATIONSPLANE DR; GORDON KR.1982; AM. STAT.; ISSN 0003-1305; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 36; NO 3; PART. 1; PP. 175-176; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

A NOTE ON THE SOLUTION OF SAMPLE SIZE PROBLEMS USING THE ODEH AND FOX CHARTSGUENTHER WC.1979; COMMUNIC. STATIST. SIMUL. COMPUT.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 8; NO 2; PP. 169-171; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

CAPACITY AND ERROR ESTIMATES FOR BOOLEAN CLASSIFIERS WITH LIMITED COMPLEXITYPEARL J.1979; I.E.E.E. TRANS. PATTERN ANAL. MACH. INTELL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 1; NO 4; PP. 350-356; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

DETERMINING SAMPLE SIZE FOR PRETESTING COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ADVERTISING COPIES.DALAL SR; SRINIVASAN V.1977; MANAG. SCI.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 23; NO 12; PP. 1284-1294; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

ESTIMATIONS DU VOLUME D'OBSERVATIONS NECESSAIRE DANS LES PROBLEMES DE CLASSIFICATION STATISTIQUE. IIVOLODIN IN.1977; TEOR. VEROJAT. PRIMEN.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 749-765; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

SAMPLE SIZE DETERMINATION FOR THE ESTIMATION OF THE VARIANCE WHEN THE UNDERLYING DISTRIBUTION IS NOT NORMAL.SCHULZ W.1976; BIOMETR. Z.; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 18; NO 7; PP. 535-546; ABS. ALLEM.; BIBL. 5 REF.Article

SOME ESTIMATORS FOR DOMAIN TOTALS.SINGH MP; TESSIER R.1976; J. AMER. STATIST. ASSOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 71; NO 354; PP. 322-325; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

SAMPLE SIZE LIMIT WHEN SAMPLING FROM A NONHOMOGENEOUS MIXTUREMEHREZ A; STULMAN A.1982; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; ISSN 0022-4065; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 4; PP. 186-189; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

A REVIEW OF OPTIMAL SAMPLE ALLOCATION FOR MULTIPURPOSE SURVEYS.BEAN JA; BURMEISTER LF.1978; BIOMETR. J.; DEU; DA. 1978; VOL. 20; NO 1; PP. 3-14; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

PUISSANCE DU TEST CHI ² AVEC L'ACCROISSEMENT DU NOMBRE DE GROUPESBOROVKOV AA.1977; TEOR. VEROJAT. PRIMEN.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1977; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 375-379; ABS. ANGL.; BIBL. 3 REF.Article